societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
#^ Why Meta Is Introducing Anti-LGBTQ Guidelines Ahead of Trump 2.0: An Interview with Judd Legum

Image/photo

Mark Zuckerberg announced this week that Meta will eliminate fact-checkers and allow some hate speech against LGBTQ people and immigrants. Popular Information's Judd Legum explains.
societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
Frank CasaFrank Casa wrote the following post Sat, 04 Jan 2025 14:40:06 -0600
I heard an interesting quote. Unfortunately it is unattributed.

"I like being right so much that, when I'm proven wrong, I change my mind."
societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
#^ Is English just badly pronounced French?

Image/photo

Enjoy this exploration of the French-ness of English. And join the Lingoda Language Sprint to let your language skills bloom this spring. Click my link and u...


Is English just badly pronounced French?
by RobWords on YouTube
societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
#^ Black Sea slave trade - Wikipedia

Image/photo

The Black Sea slave trade trafficked people across the Black Sea from Eastern Europe and the Caucasus to slavery in the Mediterranean and the Middle East. The Black Sea slave trade was a center of the slave trade between Europe and the rest of the world from antiquity until the 19th century.[1] One of the major and most significant slave trades of...


Johannes ErnstJohannes Ernst wrote the following post Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:16:30 -0600
I did not realize that slave trading in the Ottoman Empire continued until 1922. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_slave_trade#Circassian_slave_trade_(18th–20th_centuries)
societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
BroadwaybabytoBroadwaybabyto wrote the following post Sun, 05 Jan 2025 02:07:40 -0600
The same photo of people in wheel chairs with a reply from Southwest Airlines which reads We're sorry for any disappointment, Brian. We appreciate your feedback and hope to create more pleasant memories with you next time. - Racquel
Screenshot of a twitter post that reads Brian Hudson @BocaHudson Follow Typical @SouthwestAir flight to Florida! I counted 30 pre-boards needing wheelchair assistance. When we get off the plane 28 of them walk off! @FAANews @FlyTPA @FoxNews @cnnbrk <br />@MarkWilsonTV and has a photo of people In wheelchairs outside an airport gate
A Twitter reply from Mr. Jefferson which reads: “Ok, what are you gonna do so this doesn't keep happening???” And Southwest replies “Since many disabilities aren't visible, we're unable to question the validity of preboarding requests. We appreciate <br />you reaching out and hope to share the skies with you again soon. (2/2) - Patricia
A man named Brian posted a photo of people in wheelchairs waiting to board a Southwest flight. He tagged Southwest and multiple news outlets because he was outraged so many people were accessing mobility aids.

I don’t like posting content from the hellsite here… but since many businesses and airlines are only on that site … this felt worth a share.

Not because one ableist guy acted entitled and discriminatory. My issue is with the way the official Southwest account chose to deal with him.

Brian’s complaint? It’s unfair people get to use wheelchairs when they can walk. He’s mad they get to pre-board

He doesn’t understand dynamic disability. He can’t comprehend the reasons a person might require a wheelchair to navigate an airport but be able to board unassisted

Brian isn’t alone. When I was still well enough to travel I endured dirty looks and comments from other passengers whenever I would use a wheelchair.

I have invisible illnesses. I don’t “look” sick but my ability to walk or stand in lines is impaired.

I have severe POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome). When I stand my blood pools in my legs and my heart rate goes over 150 to compensate & prevent me from fainting.

I sweat, I get dizzy, I throw up. Sometimes I do faint.

It’s uttterly exhausting.

Using a wheelchair in the airport meant I could keep my heart rate at a reasonable level & avoid a serious medical emergency

It conserved energy so that I was less sick when we landed.

Yet I denied myself this accommodation for years due to fear of being mocked by “Brian’s”

These days I expect the Brian’s. Ableism has only gotten worse the last few years - and people are shockingly cruel and entitled.

They get angered by wheelchairs, disabled parking placards and masks. Boy do they get angry over masks.

I’ve learned to tune them out

My devastation from this exchange is due to the response of Southwest Airlines. A major corporation with a huge platform (and I suspect a large number of disabled customers) had a chance to call out ableism and shut it down.

They could have told Brian he was in the wrong

Instead they apologized to him.

I know people will say they had to because they apologize to all upset customers … but they didn’t HAVE to.

The apology gave his complaint validity. It emboldens the ableists among us.

Saying sorry for people who need wheelchairs is sickening. Why are you apologizing for accommodating your passengers?

Why are we pandering and giving in to hate?

Ignore the post or tell Brian it’s wrong to photograph customers & he has no valid complaint

To add insult to injury - another ableist joined in the discussion to ask what Southwest are doing to do about this “problem”.

First - there’s no problem. People requiring accommodation are not a problem to be solved.

Second - the airline legitimized it again!

Their response was that many disabilities are invisible so they aren’t allowed to question the validity of requests.

They implied that there IS an issue with validity in some cases… but that they’re simply not allowed to address it

I can’t speak for Southwest - but every airline I’ve flown has required medical documentation to receive assistance. It HAS been validated.

Even if it wasn’t - no one is getting a wheelchair for “funsies” and even if they were - it doesn’t impact Brian’s experience.

Is his trip ruined because he had to walk to the gate and someone else was pushed? Does it really matter that he had to board after a few other people?

Does he complain about those in first class or who have elite status and get to pre-board?

Of course not. Because Brian isn’t aggrieved - he’s spiteful. He has disdain for disabled people. He doesn’t believe they “deserve” the help.

Shame on Southwest for pandering to people like this. Shame on them for even insinuating people with disabilities are faking

We need to do better. Call this behaviour out when we see it and try and educate others on dynamic disability. More and more people are becoming disabled thanks to “you do you” policies … let’s help build a more inclusive world for everyone.

Southwest… do better.

I’ve blurred the photo but it showed many mostly elderly people sitting in wheelchairs.

#ableism #disability #disabilityrights #criprights #discrimination #mobilityaids #wheelchair #assistivedevices #chronicillness #invisibleillness
societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
Nieman Journalism LabNieman Journalism Lab wrote the following post Wed, 17 Apr 2024 22:26:00 -0500
Newsweek is the latest outlet to publish AI-assisted stories. The newsroom is already using AI for video production, first drafts, and a new breaking news team.

https://buff.ly/4cYD2TD


Considering how often the news media gets the facts wrong or omits important details, I am not sure using AI would make much of a difference. They are already unreliable when it comes to accuracy. So using a tool that produces unvetted inaccurate results seems to be in line with what they are already doing.
societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
Here's a nice controversial post for you. Sex is natural and a common human experience. Is it our only purpose though? And although sex is natural, what about situations where people get hurt?

Here is one point of view. What do you think?

Phil LandmeierPhil Landmeier wrote the following post Sun, 24 Dec 2023 02:48:14 -0600
@oldladyplays I made this argument 40 years ago in front of a school board. Sex has a billion years of design behind it. It's foolproof.

Do you think you're clever for figuring it out yourself? An idiot can figure it out. This is not an accident.

Teenagers are focused almost exclusively on sex. Every single thing they do is filtered through that focus. You're not going to change this no matter how much you think you ought to. We are designed to make babies.

From Nature's standpoint it is our ONLY relevant function. Yes. Only. Our only relevant function is to pass on our genes. Everything else is decoration. The big brains, high IQ, multitude of talents, all exist or are side-effects of improvements in our ability to win mates and pass on our genes.
tejan@hubzilla.monster
The problem is that parents stick their heads in the sand and don't want to think about the fact that their children become sexual beings as soon as they reach puberty. Does that mean they should be having sex that young? No. But these adolescents need guidance so they make the right decisions and don't get tricked by someone who just wants to use them.
Software Update Disables Car

societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
Dan LuuDan Luu wrote the following post Mon, 25 Dec 2023 15:46:54 -0600
"Unfortunately, a recent software update was not successful. Your vehicle cannot be driven. Please call customer support"
"Unfortunately, a recent software update was not successful. Your vehicle cannot be driven.

Please call customer support"

If this can happen due to a technical error, you know they are capable of doing this on purpose too.
Wikimedia Russia has been dissolved

societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
Jens OhligJens Ohlig wrote the following post Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:36:41 -0600
Wikimedia Russia has been dissolved.

The general assembly of Wikimedia RU decided to disband after it was made clear to the president of Wikimedia RU, who used to work as an assistant professor at Lomonosov Moscow State University, that he was to be classified as a "foreign agent" and had to resign from his post at the university.

Closing Wikimedia RU was done to protect the (now former) members of the non-profit organization that supports Russian Wikipedia.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BC/%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8&oldid=134968726#%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B0_%D0%A0%D0%A3_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D1%8F
tejan@hubzilla.monster
I'm not surprised.
State Makes It Illegal to Cross Border Illegally

societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
Mike Macgirvin 🖥️Mike Macgirvin 🖥️ wrote the following post Mon, 18 Dec 2023 23:54:55 -0600
So now it's illegal to cross the Texas/Mexico border illegally. Does this mean it wasn't illegal to cross said border illegally yesterday?

The mind boggles.

Image/photo SherBeareth⚜️ wrote the following post Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:32:01 +1100
👀 🧨

#GovGregAbbott signs #bill making #illegalimmigration a state #crime.

The new #law would authorize #police to #arrest people they #suspect crossed the #RioGrande between #ports of entry. Abbott also #signed a bill #earmarking more than $1 billion for more #borderbarriers.

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/12/18/texas-governor-abbott-bills-border-wall-illegal-entry-crime-sb3-sb4/

Image/photo
societymuse@commonwealthcivics.com
Scott M. StolzScott M. Stolz wrote the following post Tue, 19 Dec 2023 01:59:18 -0600
So now it's illegal to cross the Texas/Mexico border illegally. Does this mean it wasn't illegal to cross said border illegally yesterday?

It was illegal on the federal level, but not the state level. It's a weird quirk of being part of a federal union. For example, murder and speeding are state level crimes, but illegal immigration and money laundering are federal crimes.

Before this law, immigration enforcement was handled almost exclusively by federal agents (usually by U.S. Customs and Border Protection) and people would be prosecuted in federal courts.

With this law, the state is making it a state crime, which means state and local police can enforce the law, and people who illegally cross the border can be tried in state courts.

It should be interesting to see how this plays out. I am pretty sure the federal government will challenge the state law, and it might wind up in front of the Supreme Court to decide if a state has the authority to enforce immigration law. It could be argued both ways.